Assessing user options
I need to approach the task carefully since we might not have network access. The harness hasn't given us the sandbox config details, so I’ll work with the default settings. It’s essential to be concise and present the user with clear options, like offering a summary, the match context, or specifics about the Laws of the Game regarding red cards. Given the risk of generating incorrect information, I should avoid making up details about the match.Clarifying red card criteria
I should avoid making assertions without context, so I’ll prompt for any links or clips that the user might have. If they share those, I can give a general explanation about red card criteria. Since the conversation is in Chinese, I’ll respond in that language and keep it concise. I can offer options like writing quick news updates or social media content. I should list what they might need, including background info or rule explanations, keeping it brief and numbered for clarity.Crafting a response in Chinese
I’ll start by writing a simple message in Chinese, asking the user what they’d like me to do. Then I'll offer a list of five clear options for them to choose from, such as providing background context, explaining rules, or generating social media content. A brief overview of the rules for red cards will also be helpful. I can add a point about the specific fouls, maybe asking if they want details on Camara and Kehrer, but including their names in English isn’t a must.
这是条新闻标题。你希望我怎么帮你跟进？
可选项：
- 做一篇60秒快读的赛事背景与时间线（需要你提供比赛/链接）
- 判罚规则速查：什么情况才是直接红牌、二黄一红、以及VAR介入标准
- 中立判罚分析：按IFAB要点逐条评估（落点、脚底外露/踩踏高度、速度与力量、对手安全、是否DOGSO“明显得分机会”等）—需有犯规视频或动图
- 整理并翻译摩纳哥CEO的原话与出处
- 生成简讯/社媒文案（标题+导语+要点）
先给你一个极简规则提要：
- 直接红牌：严重犯规（过度力量/危及对手安全）、暴力行为、手球或犯规阻止明显得分机会（DOGSO）、严重侮辱性语言/手势等
- 二黄一红：两次警告累计 
- VAR介入：仅限“明显且显著”的判罚错误（如改黄为红/改红为黄或撤销）
告诉我你要选哪种，或把比赛链接/片段发我，我据此给出结论与文案。